Talk:The Sandman (comic book)
The good article status of this article is being reassessed by the community to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page. Date: 02:25, 4 February 2025 (UTC) |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Sandman (comic book) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
The Sandman (comic book) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 8, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on The Sandman (Vertigo). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.toonopedia.com/sandman3.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/07/neil-gaiman-sandman-overture/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vertigocomics.com/comics/the-sandman-overture-2013/the-sandman-overture-2
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.whatevercomics.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131015020019/http://www.worldfantasy.org/awards/1991.html to http://www.worldfantasy.org/awards/1991.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131014232309/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit50.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit50.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131207114250/http://www.mania.com/gaiman-stardust-beowulf-sandman_article_90327.html to http://www.mania.com/gaiman-stardust-beowulf-sandman_article_90327.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Draft article for the TV series
[edit]This is a notice that there is a draft for The Sandman (TV series) at Draft:The Sandman (TV series) until such a time that it is ready for inclusion in the mainspace. All are welcome to come help nurture the article's development there. — YoungForever(talk) 22:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 23 October 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 03:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
The Sandman (Vertigo) → The Sandman (comic book) – Proper disambiguation, and this is the only comic book with the Sandman title we have an article on. Also, I think it's a slightly misleading title as most of the series was published under the main DC banner, and starting this year all reprints are coming under DC Black Label. JOEBRO64 19:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support move based on nomination. --ZimZalaBim talk 21:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment, is this title enough to disambiguate from the several other Sandman comic book characters?? I could see it being misconstrued.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ortizesp, yes because Sandman (DC Comics) and Sandman (Marvel Comics) are clearly about characters, while this is the only article that is about the comic itself. Also, the current title of this article could definitely be confused with the Sandman (DC Comics) one because Vertigo was just an imprint of DC, not a separate entity. JOEBRO64 20:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Afterword
[edit]Afterword is here https://web.archive.org/web/19970605010926/http://www.dccomics.com/sandman/tori.html TOC is here https://web.archive.org/web/19970605010118/http://www.dccomics.com/sandman/sand_toc.html
I like finding old resources on archived websites as they can help editors with the development of this article. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:20, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
GA concerns
[edit]I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:
- There are lots of uncited statements in the article. While some citations are not necessary per MOS:PLOT, others like the publication history are necessary.
- There is an "update needed" orange banner under the "Lucifer" section that needs to be resolved.
- The "Reception and legacy" relies too much on a block quote: the section should be expanded upon and the block quote summaried into prose.
- There should be prose in the "Characters" section
Is anyone interested in addressing the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
There are lots of uncited statements in the article. While some citations are not necessary per MOS:PLOT, others like the publication history are necessary. There is an "update needed" orange banner under the "Lucifer" section that needs to be resolved. The "Reception and legacy" relies too much on a block quote: the section should be expanded upon and the block quote summaried into prose. There should be prose in the "Characters" section. Z1720 (talk) 02:25, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Good article reassessment nominees
- Wikipedia good articles
- Language and literature good articles
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Arts
- GA-Class vital articles in Arts
- GA-Class horror articles
- Low-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles
- GA-Class Comics articles
- High-importance Comics articles
- GA-Class Comics articles of High-importance
- GA-Class DC Comics articles
- DC Comics work group articles
- Comics collaboration candidates
- WikiProject Comics articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report